![]() ![]() If it worked like in Publisher, it would only allow users to use the tools & some (but not all) of the features of Photo's Photo Persona without having to launch Photo. ![]() Why give publishers better tools for working with mixed pixel/vector graphics than actual graphical artists? I really don't see the logic in this. But since we don't have the ExportPersona in Publisher I really think there's a strong argument to implement StudioLink to Photo and Designer. I can understand that the ExportPersona is missing in Publisher, since you normally don't work with artboards/slices in here and therefore don't need the option be setup different export-settings per slice/artboard. (When opening in Publisher I of course choose not to convert artboards to spreads, since I want to keep the document as is).Īfter I'm done and want to export my different artboards and slices, I have to jump into Designer or Photo to do this, since the Export Persona is missing in Publisher. Since the release of Publisher I open up all my Design/Photo documents in Publisher since that gives me access StudioLink all pixel and vector tools. I know that it's possible to jump between Photo and Designer via the file menu, but this takes time since the document have to close and re-open in the other app. However, it's very common for people who work with graphics to both have pixel and vector graphics in their art. You're right that as a graphics designer you don't need instant access to Publishing tools. but when you do image editing, why do you need instant access to Publishing tools? When you are designing a book in publisher and you want to edit an image, you need instant access to photo-editing tools to get it done easy and fast. In my opinion it's not the same necessary for the other apps. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |